Take stock
Review the live system, its evaluation set and its costs, then agree thresholds and alerts.
veridive is now an applied AI company. Looking for the answer engine?Looking for the answer engine? What happened
05 Improve · Reliability & continuous improvement
Launch is a starting point. veridive helps you watch how the system performs, respond when models or data change, and choose the next improvement with evidence.
05Improve — Reliability & continuous improvement
AI reliability and continuous improvement is the work that keeps an AI system useful after launch. veridive monitors quality, cost and latency, re-runs the evaluation set whenever a model, prompt or data source changes, handles incidents with written runbooks, and reviews the system with its owners every quarter to choose the next improvement on evidence.
05.1 How it runs
Review the live system, its evaluation set and its costs, then agree thresholds and alerts.
Monitor continuously, run regression checks on every change and follow the runbook when something breaks.
Review results with the owners and choose the next improvement with evidence.
Monthly
A named team working alongside your internal owners, with monthly capacity, support scope and service levels agreed together.
≈6–10 weeks
Reliability starts before launch: a pilot is accepted only when monitoring, regression checks and a runbook are in place.
05.3 Outcomes
Changes in quality or cost are caught by checks, not by customers.
Costs stay under the ceiling, and every increase has an explanation.
New models are adopted when the evaluation set shows they are better, not before.
Runbooks and documentation mean nothing depends on us remembering.
Questions
The owner named in the runbook, following a written first step. Before launch we agree who watches the system, which alerts fire when quality or cost moves outside its thresholds, and what happens next. In an Embedded AI Partnership, veridive takes on part of that responsibility under a written support scope, alongside your internal owners.
Costs usually rise because usage grows, prompts get longer or tasks run on a larger model than they need. We track cost per task, set budgets and alerts, and route routine cases to smaller models while harder ones go to a larger model or a person. Every change is checked against the evaluation set first.
Every time something it depends on changes, and at least every quarter. A new model version, a prompt edit or a new data source can change quality quietly, so the evaluation set runs as a regression check on each change. The quarterly review then looks at trends, costs and the next improvement.
Tell us what you are seeing. We will reply within one business day with a recommended first step.